Curtin vs Holder, ACT suburb comparison

Curtin for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CurtinHolder

Overall score

Curtin

74.4/100

Holder

67.4/100

Crime rate

Curtin

11.7 / 1k

Holder

6.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Curtin

267

Holder

88

Population

Curtin

5,569

Holder

2,816

Metric leadCurtin 5Holder 22 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCurtinHolder
Overall score74.4/10067.4/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate11.7 / 1k6.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools86
Parks & reserves1
Walkability76.0/10070.0/100
Nearby amenities26788
Planning activity131
Population5,5692,816
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Curtin reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Holder is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Curtin is stronger for schools and education options and walkability; Holder answers with a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook.

Investors and households prioritising schools may find Curtin the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Holder.

Related comparisons