Overall score
Denman Prospect
62.9/100
Holder
67.4/100
Denman Prospect vs Holder, ACT suburb comparison
Holder for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Denman ProspectHolder
Crime rate
Denman Prospect
8.4 / 1k
Holder
6.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Denman Prospect
428
Holder
88
Population
Denman Prospect
2,759
Holder
2,816
Metric leadDenman Prospect 1Holder 72 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Denman Prospect | Holder |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 62.9/100 | 67.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 42.4/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 8.4 / 1k | 6.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 1 |
| Walkability | 64.0/100 | 70.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 428 | 88 |
| Planning activity | 17 | 1 |
| Population | 2,759 | 2,816 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Denman Prospect is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Holder is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Denman Prospect is stronger for nearby cafés and amenities; Holder answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Holder, while Denman Prospect remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.