Overall score
Chapman
62.1/100
Holder
67.4/100
Chapman vs Holder, ACT suburb comparison
Chapman for schools; Holder for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ChapmanHolder
Crime rate
Chapman
12.5 / 1k
Holder
6.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Chapman
62
Holder
88
Population
Chapman
2,867
Holder
2,816
Metric leadChapman 3Holder 43 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
Comparison summary
Chapman is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Holder is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Chapman sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Holder is closer to the city centre.
On the data, Chapman is stronger for parks and reserves and walkability; Holder answers with a quieter safety profile and schools and education options.
Chapman suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Holder is the stronger match for retirees and families.