Holder vs Wright, ACT suburb comparison

Holder for retirees and families; Wright for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

HolderWright

Overall score

Holder

67.4/100

Wright

61.7/100

Crime rate

Holder

6.2 / 1k

Wright

20.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Holder

88

Wright

77

Population

Holder

2,816

Wright

3,808

Metric leadHolder 6Wright 22 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHolderWright
Overall score67.4/10061.7/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate6.2 / 1k20.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools63
Parks & reserves12
Walkability70.0/10051.0/100
Nearby amenities8877
Planning activity12
Population2,8163,808
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Holder reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Wright is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Holder pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, whereas Wright is the better pick for parks and reserves and a larger local community.

Choose Holder if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Wright for households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons