Holder vs Lyons, ACT suburb comparison

Holder for retirees and investment; Lyons for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

HolderLyons

Overall score

Holder

67.4/100

Lyons

57.0/100

Crime rate

Holder

6.2 / 1k

Lyons

17.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Holder

88

Lyons

103

Population

Holder

2,816

Lyons

3,271

Metric leadHolder 6Lyons 3across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHolderLyons
Overall score67.4/10057.0/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10026.3/100
Crime rate6.2 / 1k17.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools69
Parks & reserves1
Walkability70.0/10051.0/100
Nearby amenities88103
Planning activity14
Population2,8163,271
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Holder reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Lyons is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Holder is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Lyons answers with schools and education options and nearby cafés and amenities.

Holder suits retirees and investors more clearly, whereas Lyons is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons