Fisher vs Lyons, ACT suburb comparison

Fisher for retirees and investment; Lyons for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FisherLyons

Overall score

Fisher

54.1/100

Lyons

57.0/100

Crime rate

Fisher

9.5 / 1k

Lyons

17.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Fisher

65

Lyons

103

Population

Fisher

3,219

Lyons

3,271

Metric leadFisher 4Lyons 5across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFisherLyons
Overall score54.1/10057.0/100
Housing (desirability)50.1/10026.3/100
Crime rate9.5 / 1k17.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools49
Walkability31.0/10051.0/100
Nearby amenities65103
Planning activity34
Population3,2193,271
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Fisher is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Lyons is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Fisher sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Lyons is closer to the city centre.

Fisher tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Lyons stands out for schools and education options and walkability.

Choose Fisher if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward Lyons for families and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons

Fisher vs Lyons, ACT suburb comparison | Suburb Guide