Fisher vs Kambah, ACT suburb comparison

Fisher for retirees and families; Kambah for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FisherKambah

Overall score

Fisher

54.1/100

Kambah

76.5/100

Crime rate

Fisher

9.5 / 1k

Kambah

16.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Fisher

65

Kambah

260

Population

Fisher

3,219

Kambah

15,670

Metric leadFisher 4Kambah 5across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFisherKambah
Overall score54.1/10076.5/100
Housing (desirability)50.1/10076.0/100
Crime rate9.5 / 1k16.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools43
Parks & reserves5
Walkability31.0/10092.0/100
Nearby amenities65260
Planning activity316
Population3,21915,670
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Fisher is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Kambah is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Fisher is stronger for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options; Kambah answers with housing affordability and walkability.

On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Kambah, while Fisher remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons