Fisher vs Rivett, ACT suburb comparison

Fisher for retirees; Rivett for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FisherRivett

Overall score

Fisher

54.1/100

Rivett

63.4/100

Crime rate

Fisher

9.5 / 1k

Rivett

12.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Fisher

65

Rivett

73

Population

Fisher

3,219

Rivett

3,354

Metric leadFisher 2Rivett 7across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFisherRivett
Overall score54.1/10063.4/100
Housing (desirability)50.1/10076.0/100
Crime rate9.5 / 1k12.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools45
Parks & reserves1
Walkability31.0/10059.0/100
Nearby amenities6573
Planning activity32
Population3,2193,354
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Fisher reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Rivett is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Fisher tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Rivett stands out for housing affordability and schools and education options.

Fisher suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Rivett is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons