Overall score
Dunlop
45.6/100
Melba
59.8/100
Melba for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Dunlop
45.6/100
Melba
59.8/100
Crime rate
Dunlop
11.8 / 1k
Melba
12.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Dunlop
134
Melba
120
Population
Dunlop
7,265
Melba
3,383
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Dunlop | Melba |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.6/100 | 59.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 50.0/100 | 59.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 11.8 / 1k | 12.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 6 |
| Weather (desirability) | 51.2/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 61.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 134 | 120 |
| Planning activity | 3 | 3 |
| Green cover | 5.4% | 20.3% |
| Population | 7,265 | 3,383 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 9/10 |
Dunlop is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Melba is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Dunlop pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community, whereas Melba is the better pick for schools and education options, walkability, and overall desirability.
On balance, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Melba, while Dunlop remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.