Dunlop vs Melba, ACT Suburb Comparison

Melba for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

DunlopMelba

Overall score

Dunlop

45.6/100

Melba

59.8/100

Crime rate

Dunlop

11.8 / 1k

Melba

12.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Dunlop

134

Melba

120

Population

Dunlop

7,265

Melba

3,383

Metric leadDunlop 3Melba 53 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDunlopMelba
Overall score45.6/10059.8/100
Housing (desirability)50.0/10059.3/100
Crime rate11.8 / 1k12.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools26
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Walkability32.0/10061.0/100
Nearby amenities134120
Planning activity33
Green cover5.4%20.3%
Population7,2653,383
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/109/10

Comparison summary

Dunlop is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Melba is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Dunlop pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community, whereas Melba is the better pick for schools and education options, walkability, and overall desirability.

On balance, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Melba, while Dunlop remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons