Overall score
Durham Lead
54.3/100
Mount Clear
55.1/100
Durham Lead for retirees and schools; Mount Clear for families and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Durham Lead
54.3/100
Mount Clear
55.1/100
Crime rate
Durham Lead
16.7 / 1k
Mount Clear
58.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Durham Lead
1
Mount Clear
107
Population
Durham Lead
408
Mount Clear
3,671
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Durham Lead | Mount Clear |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.3/100 | 55.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 43.2/100 | 58.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 16.7 / 1k | 58.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | — | 14 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 75.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 107 |
| Planning activity | 21 | 26 |
| Green cover | 38.3% | 9.6% |
| Population | 408 | 3,671 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 5/10 |
Durham Lead is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, while Mount Clear is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Mount Clear sits among greener hillside streets, while Durham Lead keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Durham Lead pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Mount Clear is the better pick for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and walkability. On housing, Durham Lead sits in a gently premium band, compared with a approachable feel in Mount Clear.
On balance, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Mount Clear, while Durham Lead remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.