Overall score
Magpie
46.0/100
Mount Clear
55.1/100
Magpie for investment; Mount Clear for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Magpie
46.0/100
Mount Clear
55.1/100
Crime rate
Magpie
84.7 / 1k
Mount Clear
58.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Magpie
2
Mount Clear
107
Population
Magpie
368
Mount Clear
3,671
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Magpie | Mount Clear |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 46.0/100 | 55.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 53.5/100 | 58.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 84.7 / 1k | 58.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 5 |
| Public transport stops | — | 14 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 75.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 107 |
| Planning activity | 3 | 26 |
| Green cover | 10.8% | 9.6% |
| Population | 368 | 3,671 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 5/10 |
Put side by side, Magpie is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, and Mount Clear is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Mount Clear sits among greener hillside streets, while Magpie keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Magpie is stronger for housing affordability, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Mount Clear answers with a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and walkability. Magpie generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Mount Clear leans toward more approachable mid-market housing.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Mount Clear, while Magpie remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.