Magpie vs Mount Clear, VIC Suburb Comparison

Magpie for investment; Mount Clear for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MagpieMount Clear

Overall score

Magpie

46.0/100

Mount Clear

55.1/100

Crime rate

Magpie

84.7 / 1k

Mount Clear

58.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Magpie

2

Mount Clear

107

Population

Magpie

368

Mount Clear

3,671

Metric leadMagpie 3Mount Clear 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMagpieMount Clear
Overall score46.0/10055.1/100
Housing (desirability)53.5/10058.8/100
Crime rate84.7 / 1k58.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools24
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves—5
Public transport stops—14
Walkability0.0/10075.0/100
Nearby amenities2107
Planning activity326
Green cover10.8%9.6%
Population3683,671
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/105/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Magpie is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, and Mount Clear is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Mount Clear sits among greener hillside streets, while Magpie keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Magpie is stronger for housing affordability, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Mount Clear answers with a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and walkability. Magpie generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Mount Clear leans toward more approachable mid-market housing.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Mount Clear, while Magpie remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons