Overall score
Magpie
46.0/100
Mount Helen
60.4/100
Magpie for investment; Mount Helen for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Magpie
46.0/100
Mount Helen
60.4/100
Crime rate
Magpie
84.7 / 1k
Mount Helen
39.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Magpie
2
Mount Helen
88
Population
Magpie
368
Mount Helen
3,011
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Magpie | Mount Helen |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 46.0/100 | 60.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 53.5/100 | 53.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 84.7 / 1k | 39.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Public transport stops | — | 19 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 32.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 88 |
| Planning activity | 3 | 30 |
| Green cover | 10.8% | 16.4% |
| Population | 368 | 3,011 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 8/10 |
Magpie reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Mount Helen is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Helen sits among greener hillside streets, while Magpie keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Magpie is stronger for housing affordability, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook; Mount Helen answers with a quieter safety profile, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.
Magpie suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Mount Helen is the stronger match for retirees, families, and investors.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.