Magpie vs Mount Helen, VIC Suburb Comparison

Magpie for investment; Mount Helen for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MagpieMount Helen

Overall score

Magpie

46.0/100

Mount Helen

60.4/100

Crime rate

Magpie

84.7 / 1k

Mount Helen

39.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Magpie

2

Mount Helen

88

Population

Magpie

368

Mount Helen

3,011

Metric leadMagpie 3Mount Helen 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMagpieMount Helen
Overall score46.0/10060.4/100
Housing (desirability)53.5/10053.2/100
Crime rate84.7 / 1k39.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools21
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves—1
Public transport stops—19
Walkability0.0/10032.5/100
Nearby amenities288
Planning activity330
Green cover10.8%16.4%
Population3683,011
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/108/10

Comparison summary

Magpie reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Mount Helen is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Helen sits among greener hillside streets, while Magpie keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Magpie is stronger for housing affordability, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook; Mount Helen answers with a quieter safety profile, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Magpie suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Mount Helen is the stronger match for retirees, families, and investors.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons