Overall score
Buninyong
64.9/100
Magpie
46.0/100
Buninyong vs Magpie, VIC Suburb Comparison
Buninyong for retirees and families; Magpie for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BuninyongMagpie
Crime rate
Buninyong
34.3 / 1k
Magpie
84.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Buninyong
78
Magpie
2
Population
Buninyong
3,797
Magpie
368
Metric leadBuninyong 8Magpie 21 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Buninyong | Magpie |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 64.9/100 | 46.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 55.9/100 | 53.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 34.3 / 1k | 84.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | — |
| Public transport stops | 18 | — |
| Walkability | 71.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 78 | 2 |
| Planning activity | 65 | 3 |
| Green cover | 27.8% | 10.8% |
| Population | 3,797 | 368 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
Buninyong reads as a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote; Magpie is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.
Buninyong tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Magpie stands out for housing affordability, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook. Buninyong generally means more sought-after housing, while Magpie leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Buninyong, while Magpie remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.