Buninyong vs Mount Clear, VIC Suburb Comparison

Buninyong for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BuninyongMount Clear

Overall score

Buninyong

64.9/100

Mount Clear

55.1/100

Crime rate

Buninyong

34.3 / 1k

Mount Clear

58.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Buninyong

78

Mount Clear

107

Population

Buninyong

3,797

Mount Clear

3,671

Metric leadBuninyong 7Mount Clear 51 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBuninyongMount Clear
Overall score64.9/10055.1/100
Housing (desirability)55.9/10058.8/100
Crime rate34.3 / 1k58.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools14
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves125
Public transport stops1814
Walkability71.0/10075.0/100
Nearby amenities78107
Planning activity6526
Green cover27.8%9.6%
Population3,7973,671
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/105/10

Comparison summary

Buninyong is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, while Mount Clear is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Mount Clear sits among greener hillside streets, while Buninyong keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Buninyong tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and public transport access, while Mount Clear stands out for housing affordability, schools and education options, and walkability. On housing, Buninyong sits in a expensive band, compared with a approachable feel in Mount Clear.

Retirees may find Buninyong the better fit, while families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Mount Clear.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons