Earlville vs Woree, QLD Suburb Comparison

Earlville for families and investment; Woree for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

EarlvilleWoree

Overall score

Earlville

45.0/100

Woree

42.2/100

Crime rate

Earlville

236.8 / 1k

Woree

107.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Earlville

99

Woree

114

Population

Earlville

4,200

Woree

5,127

Metric leadEarlville 6Woree 32 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryEarlvilleWoree
Overall score45.0/10042.2/100
Housing (desirability)72.7/10055.3/100
Crime rate236.8 / 1k107.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools55
Weather (desirability)11.8/10011.8/100
Parks & reserves107
Walkability44.0/10041.0/100
Nearby amenities99114
Green cover38.2%10.3%
Population4,2005,127
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/101/10

Comparison summary

Earlville is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, while Woree is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.

Earlville tends to lead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and walkability, while Woree stands out for a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Earlville, while Woree remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons