Overall score
Earlville
45.0/100
Woree
42.2/100
Earlville for families and investment; Woree for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Earlville
45.0/100
Woree
42.2/100
Crime rate
Earlville
236.8 / 1k
Woree
107.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Earlville
99
Woree
114
Population
Earlville
4,200
Woree
5,127
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Earlville | Woree |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.0/100 | 42.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 72.7/100 | 55.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 236.8 / 1k | 107.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 5 |
| Weather (desirability) | 11.8/100 | 11.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 10 | 7 |
| Walkability | 44.0/100 | 41.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 99 | 114 |
| Green cover | 38.2% | 10.3% |
| Population | 4,200 | 5,127 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 1/10 |
Earlville is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, while Woree is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.
Earlville tends to lead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and walkability, while Woree stands out for a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Earlville, while Woree remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.