Earlville vs Woree, QLD suburb comparison

Earlville for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

EarlvilleWoree

Overall score

Earlville

53.4/100

Woree

50.2/100

Crime rate

Earlville

145.9 / 1k

Woree

63.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Earlville

97

Woree

113

Population

Earlville

4,200

Woree

5,127

Metric leadEarlville 5Woree 31 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryEarlvilleWoree
Overall score53.4/10050.2/100
Housing (desirability)77.2/10068.1/100
Crime rate145.9 / 1k63.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools55
Parks & reserves107
Walkability44.0/10016.0/100
Nearby amenities97113
Population4,2005,127
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/101/10

Comparison summary

Earlville is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, while Woree is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.

Earlville tends to lead on housing affordability and parks and reserves, while Woree stands out for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options.

On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Earlville, while Woree remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons