Overall score
Bungalow
37.6/100
Earlville
45.0/100
Bungalow for schools; Earlville for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Bungalow
37.6/100
Earlville
45.0/100
Crime rate
Bungalow
237.2 / 1k
Earlville
236.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bungalow
97
Earlville
99
Population
Bungalow
2,358
Earlville
4,200
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bungalow | Earlville |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 37.6/100 | 45.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 64.2/100 | 72.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 237.2 / 1k | 236.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 5 |
| Weather (desirability) | 11.8/100 | 11.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 10 |
| Walkability | 24.0/100 | 44.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 97 | 99 |
| Green cover | 1.9% | 38.2% |
| Population | 2,358 | 4,200 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 3/10 |
Bungalow reads as a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace; Earlville is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote.
Bungalow tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, plus schools and education options, while Earlville stands out for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and walkability.
Bungalow suits families and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Earlville is the stronger match for retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.