Bungalow vs Earlville, QLD Suburb Comparison

Bungalow for schools; Earlville for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BungalowEarlville

Overall score

Bungalow

37.6/100

Earlville

45.0/100

Crime rate

Bungalow

237.2 / 1k

Earlville

236.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bungalow

97

Earlville

99

Population

Bungalow

2,358

Earlville

4,200

Metric leadBungalow 1Earlville 91 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBungalowEarlville
Overall score37.6/10045.0/100
Housing (desirability)64.2/10072.7/100
Crime rate237.2 / 1k236.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools75
Weather (desirability)11.8/10011.8/100
Parks & reserves110
Walkability24.0/10044.0/100
Nearby amenities9799
Green cover1.9%38.2%
Population2,3584,200
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/103/10

Comparison summary

Bungalow reads as a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace; Earlville is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote.

Bungalow tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, plus schools and education options, while Earlville stands out for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and walkability.

Bungalow suits families and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Earlville is the stronger match for retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons