Overall score
Eastwood
36.8/100
Glen Osmond
49.3/100
Eastwood for retirees; Glen Osmond for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Eastwood
36.8/100
Glen Osmond
49.3/100
Crime rate
Eastwood
87.9 / 1k
Glen Osmond
61.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Eastwood
87
Glen Osmond
107
Population
Eastwood
712
Glen Osmond
2,154
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Eastwood | Glen Osmond |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 36.8/100 | 49.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 20.8/100 | 30.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 87.9 / 1k | 61.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 4 | 11 |
| Walkability | 12.0/100 | 24.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 87 | 107 |
| Planning activity | 11 | 21 |
| Population | 712 | 2,154 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Eastwood is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap, and Glen Osmond is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Eastwood is stronger for a calmer planning outlook; Glen Osmond answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Retirees may find Eastwood the better fit, while families and investors are more likely to prefer Glen Osmond.