Elizabeth Downs vs One Tree Hill, SA Suburb Comparison

One Tree Hill for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Elizabeth DownsOne Tree Hill

Overall score

Elizabeth Downs

26.5/100

One Tree Hill

42.8/100

Crime rate

Elizabeth Downs

104.4 / 1k

One Tree Hill

27.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Elizabeth Downs

79

One Tree Hill

7

Population

Elizabeth Downs

5,160

One Tree Hill

1,043

Metric leadElizabeth Downs 4One Tree Hill 52 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryElizabeth DownsOne Tree Hill
Overall score26.5/10042.8/100
Housing (desirability)48.5/10051.4/100
Crime rate104.4 / 1k27.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools52
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Public transport stops42—
Walkability32.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities797
Planning activity8818
Green cover0.0%0.0%
Population5,1601,043
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Elizabeth Downs is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and One Tree Hill is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Elizabeth Downs sits in a middle-ring position, whereas One Tree Hill is within day-trip reach of the capital.

On the data, Elizabeth Downs is stronger for housing affordability, schools and education options, and walkability; One Tree Hill answers with a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Elizabeth Downs generally means more approachable housing costs, while One Tree Hill leans toward more sought-after housing.

Elizabeth Downs suits investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas One Tree Hill is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons