Davoren Park vs Elizabeth Downs, SA Suburb Comparison

Davoren Park for retirees and families; Elizabeth Downs for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Davoren ParkElizabeth Downs

Overall score

Davoren Park

22.2/100

Elizabeth Downs

26.5/100

Crime rate

Davoren Park

113.9 / 1k

Elizabeth Downs

104.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Davoren Park

100

Elizabeth Downs

79

Population

Davoren Park

6,392

Elizabeth Downs

5,160

Metric leadDavoren Park 4Elizabeth Downs 53 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDavoren ParkElizabeth Downs
Overall score22.2/10026.5/100
Housing (desirability)39.2/10048.5/100
Crime rate113.9 / 1k104.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools25
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Public transport stops4442
Walkability32.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities10079
Planning activity12888
Green cover0.8%0.0%
Population6,3925,160
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Davoren Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Elizabeth Downs is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Davoren Park tends to lead on public transport access, nearby cafés and amenities, and tree cover and green space, while Elizabeth Downs stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options.

On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Elizabeth Downs, while Davoren Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons