Falcon vs Herron, WA Suburb Comparison

Falcon for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FalconHerron

Overall score

Falcon

42.1/100

Herron

28.2/100

Crime rate

Falcon

59.7 / 1k

Herron

59.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Falcon

91

Herron

2

Population

Falcon

5,531

Herron

438

Metric leadFalcon 6Herron 21 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFalconHerron
Overall score42.1/10028.2/100
Housing (desirability)50.2/10050.1/100
Crime rate59.7 / 1k59.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)23.4/10049.1/100
Parks & reserves5—
Public transport stops48—
Walkability88.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities912
Green cover2.2%0.0%
Population5,531438
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/105/10

Comparison summary

Falcon reads as a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm; Herron is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace. Falcon leans into coastal living, while Herron feels more inland and suburban in character.

Falcon tends to lead on housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Herron stands out for stronger socioeconomic advantage.

On balance, families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Falcon, while Herron remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons