Falcon vs Herron, WA suburb comparison

Falcon for families and beach lifestyle.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FalconHerron

Overall score

Falcon

42.8/100

Herron

19.2/100

Crime rate

Falcon

2533.0 / 1k

Herron

28344.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Falcon

54

Herron

0

Population

Falcon

5,531

Herron

438

Metric leadFalcon 6Herron 1across 7 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFalconHerron
Overall score42.8/10019.2/100
Housing (desirability)26.4/10014.3/100
Crime rate2533.0 / 1k28344.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Parks & reserves5
Public transport stops48
Walkability59.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities540
Population5,531438
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/105/10

Comparison summary

Falcon reads as a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm; Herron is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace. Falcon leans into coastal living, while Herron feels more inland and suburban in character.

Falcon tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Herron stands out for stronger socioeconomic advantage. Falcon generally means more approachable housing costs, while Herron leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Falcon, while Herron remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons