Forster vs Hawks Nest, NSW suburb comparison

Forster for investment and value; Hawks Nest for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ForsterHawks Nest

Overall score

Forster

43.1/100

Hawks Nest

32.3/100

Crime rate

Forster

86.9 / 1k

Hawks Nest

Nearby amenities

Forster

46

Hawks Nest

0

Population

Forster

14,187

Hawks Nest

1,413

Metric leadForster 6Hawks Nest 21 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryForsterHawks Nest
Overall score43.1/10032.3/100
Housing (desirability)39.8/10010.6/100
Crime rate86.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Parks & reserves184
Public transport stops41233
Walkability30.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities460
Planning activity9216
Population14,1871,413
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Forster is a regional established suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and Hawks Nest is a beachside smaller community where the coast sets the tone. Hawks Nest leans into coastal living, while Forster feels more inland and suburban in character.

Forster tends to lead on housing affordability and parks and reserves, while Hawks Nest stands out for a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Forster sits in a affordable band, compared with a well priced feel in Hawks Nest.

Forster suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Hawks Nest is the stronger match for retirees and people chasing a beach lifestyle.

Related comparisons