Forster vs Port Macquarie, NSW suburb comparison

Port Macquarie for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ForsterPort Macquarie

Overall score

Forster

43.1/100

Port Macquarie

57.6/100

Crime rate

Forster

86.9 / 1k

Port Macquarie

86.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Forster

46

Port Macquarie

139

Population

Forster

14,187

Port Macquarie

47,693

Metric leadForster 1Port Macquarie 10across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryForsterPort Macquarie
Overall score43.1/10057.6/100
Housing (desirability)39.8/10060.2/100
Crime rate86.9 / 1k86.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools16
Parks & reserves1837
Public transport stops412653
Walkability30.0/10053.0/100
Nearby amenities46139
Planning activity93238
Population14,18747,693
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Forster is a regional established suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and Port Macquarie is a regional larger suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.

On the data, Forster is stronger for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook; Port Macquarie answers with housing affordability and schools and education options. Forster generally means more approachable housing costs, while Port Macquarie leans toward more sought-after housing.

Choose Forster if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Port Macquarie for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons