Overall score
Forster
43.1/100
Port Macquarie
57.6/100
Port Macquarie for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Forster
43.1/100
Port Macquarie
57.6/100
Crime rate
Forster
86.9 / 1k
Port Macquarie
86.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Forster
46
Port Macquarie
139
Population
Forster
14,187
Port Macquarie
47,693
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Forster | Port Macquarie |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.1/100 | 57.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 39.8/100 | 60.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 86.9 / 1k | 86.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | 18 | 37 |
| Public transport stops | 412 | 653 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 53.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 46 | 139 |
| Planning activity | 93 | 238 |
| Population | 14,187 | 47,693 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 4/10 |
Put side by side, Forster is a regional established suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and Port Macquarie is a regional larger suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.
On the data, Forster is stronger for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook; Port Macquarie answers with housing affordability and schools and education options. Forster generally means more approachable housing costs, while Port Macquarie leans toward more sought-after housing.
Choose Forster if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Port Macquarie for investors and value-focused buyers.