Overall score
Forster
43.1/100
Tuncurry
45.6/100
Forster for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Forster
43.1/100
Tuncurry
45.6/100
Crime rate
Forster
86.9 / 1k
Tuncurry
86.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Forster
46
Tuncurry
84
Population
Forster
14,187
Tuncurry
6,376
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Forster | Tuncurry |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.1/100 | 45.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 39.8/100 | 40.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 86.9 / 1k | 86.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 18 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 412 | 165 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 46 | 84 |
| Planning activity | 92 | 25 |
| Population | 14,187 | 6,376 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 1/10 |
Forster reads as a regional established suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote; Tuncurry is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.
On the data, Forster is stronger for parks and reserves and public transport access; Tuncurry answers with housing affordability and nearby cafés and amenities.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Forster, while Tuncurry remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.