Overall score
Port Macquarie
57.6/100
Gosnells
53.8/100
Port Macquarie for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Port Macquarie
57.6/100
Gosnells
53.8/100
Crime rate
Port Macquarie
86.7 / 1k
Gosnells
553.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Port Macquarie
139
Gosnells
449
Population
Port Macquarie
47,693
Gosnells
21,149
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Port Macquarie | Gosnells |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 57.6/100 | 53.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 60.2/100 | 38.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 86.7 / 1k | 553.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 37 | 40 |
| Public transport stops | 653 | 143 |
| Walkability | 53.0/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 139 | 449 |
| Planning activity | 238 | — |
| Population | 47,693 | 21,149 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 1/10 |
Port Macquarie (NSW) is a regional larger suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace, while Gosnells (WA) is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Port Macquarie sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Gosnells is in a middle-ring position.
Port Macquarie pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Gosnells is the better pick for parks and reserves and walkability. Port Macquarie generally means more sought-after housing, while Gosnells leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Investors and value-focused buyers may find Port Macquarie the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Gosnells.