Port Macquarie vs Gosnells suburb comparison (NSW vs WA)

Port Macquarie for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Port MacquarieGosnells

Overall score

Port Macquarie

57.6/100

Gosnells

53.8/100

Crime rate

Port Macquarie

86.7 / 1k

Gosnells

553.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Port Macquarie

139

Gosnells

449

Population

Port Macquarie

47,693

Gosnells

21,149

Metric leadPort Macquarie 6Gosnells 4across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryPort MacquarieGosnells
Overall score57.6/10053.8/100
Housing (desirability)60.2/10038.2/100
Crime rate86.7 / 1k553.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools67
Parks & reserves3740
Public transport stops653143
Walkability53.0/10055.0/100
Nearby amenities139449
Planning activity238
Population47,69321,149
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/101/10

Comparison summary

Port Macquarie (NSW) is a regional larger suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace, while Gosnells (WA) is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Port Macquarie sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Gosnells is in a middle-ring position.

Port Macquarie pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Gosnells is the better pick for parks and reserves and walkability. Port Macquarie generally means more sought-after housing, while Gosnells leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Port Macquarie the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Gosnells.

Related comparisons