Overall score
Golden Square
62.9/100
Ironbark
50.7/100
Golden Square for investment and value; Ironbark for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Golden Square
62.9/100
Ironbark
50.7/100
Crime rate
Golden Square
92.4 / 1k
Ironbark
84.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Golden Square
123
Ironbark
52
Population
Golden Square
9,220
Ironbark
1,163
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Golden Square | Ironbark |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 62.9/100 | 50.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 80.9/100 | 78.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 92.4 / 1k | 84.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 11 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 65 | 15 |
| Walkability | 82.0/100 | 55.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 123 | 52 |
| Planning activity | 134 | 22 |
| Population | 9,220 | 1,163 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Golden Square is a regional established suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace, and Ironbark is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote.
On the data, Golden Square is stronger for housing affordability and parks and reserves; Ironbark answers with a quieter safety profile and schools and education options.
Investors and value-focused buyers may find Golden Square the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Ironbark.