Overall score
Golden Square
62.9/100
Kangaroo Flat
73.3/100
Kangaroo Flat for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Golden Square
62.9/100
Kangaroo Flat
73.3/100
Crime rate
Golden Square
92.4 / 1k
Kangaroo Flat
101.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Golden Square
123
Kangaroo Flat
153
Population
Golden Square
9,220
Kangaroo Flat
11,328
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Golden Square | Kangaroo Flat |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 62.9/100 | 73.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 80.9/100 | 88.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 92.4 / 1k | 101.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 10 |
| Public transport stops | 65 | 70 |
| Walkability | 82.0/100 | 90.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 123 | 153 |
| Planning activity | 134 | 103 |
| Population | 9,220 | 11,328 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 2/10 |
Golden Square is a regional established suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace, while Kangaroo Flat is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.
Golden Square pulls ahead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Kangaroo Flat is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Kangaroo Flat, while Golden Square remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.