Gray vs Rosebery, NT suburb comparison

Gray for families and schools; Rosebery for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GrayRosebery

Overall score

Gray

42.4/100

Rosebery

51.7/100

Nearby amenities

Gray

55

Rosebery

55

Population

Gray

3,142

Rosebery

4,127

Metric leadGray 2Rosebery 61 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGrayRosebery
Overall score42.4/10051.7/100
Housing (desirability)13.0/10041.2/100
Schools & preschools87
Parks & reserves72
Public transport stops1517
Walkability22.5/10052.5/100
Nearby amenities5555
Population3,1424,127
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/109/10

Comparison summary

Gray reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Rosebery is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Gray tends to lead on parks and reserves, while Rosebery stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Gray generally means more approachable housing costs, while Rosebery leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Rosebery, while Gray remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons