Gunn vs Rosebery, NT suburb comparison

Rosebery for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GunnRosebery

Overall score

Gunn

35.4/100

Rosebery

51.7/100

Nearby amenities

Gunn

31

Rosebery

55

Population

Gunn

2,564

Rosebery

4,127

Metric leadGunn 1Rosebery 8across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGunnRosebery
Overall score35.4/10051.7/100
Housing (desirability)22.4/10041.2/100
Schools & preschools47
Parks & reserves62
Public transport stops317
Walkability4.5/10052.5/100
Nearby amenities3155
Population2,5644,127
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Gunn is a settled metro mid-sized suburb that balances access with everyday calm, and Rosebery is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Gunn tends to lead on parks and reserves, while Rosebery stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. On housing, Gunn sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Rosebery.

On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Rosebery, while Gunn remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons