Overall score
Greenfields
52.0/100
Parklands
19.2/100
Greenfields vs Parklands, WA suburb comparison
Greenfields for families and investment; Parklands for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
GreenfieldsParklands
Crime rate
Greenfields
1432.5 / 1k
Parklands
20942.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Greenfields
85
Parklands
40
Population
Greenfields
9,869
Parklands
603
Metric leadGreenfields 8Parklands 1across 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesParklands
- Best for familiesGreenfields
- Best for investmentGreenfields
- Best for best valueGreenfields
- Best for best schoolsGreenfields
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Greenfields | Parklands |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.0/100 | 19.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 21.1/100 | 9.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 1432.5 / 1k | 20942.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 60 | — |
| Walkability | 74.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 85 | 40 |
| Population | 9,869 | 603 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 6/10 |
Comparison summary
Greenfields is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Parklands is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel.
Greenfields tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Parklands stands out for stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Greenfields sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Parklands.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Greenfields, while Parklands remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.