Overall score
Hackham
53.3/100
Onkaparinga Hills
44.5/100
Hackham for investment and value; Onkaparinga Hills for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Hackham
53.3/100
Onkaparinga Hills
44.5/100
Crime rate
Hackham
38.1 / 1k
Onkaparinga Hills
11.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Hackham
93
Onkaparinga Hills
0
Population
Hackham
4,491
Onkaparinga Hills
2,610
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Hackham | Onkaparinga Hills |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 53.3/100 | 44.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 77.4/100 | 58.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 38.1 / 1k | 11.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | — |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 21 | 4 |
| Walkability | 75.0/100 | 6.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 93 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 32 | 41 |
| Population | 4,491 | 2,610 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 7/10 |
Hackham is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Onkaparinga Hills is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Onkaparinga Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Hackham keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Hackham tends to lead on housing affordability and public transport access, while Onkaparinga Hills stands out for a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Hackham generally means more approachable housing costs, while Onkaparinga Hills leans toward more sought-after housing.
Families and investors may find Hackham the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Onkaparinga Hills.