Overall score
Hazelmere
35.6/100
Midland
55.1/100
Hazelmere vs Midland, WA suburb comparison
Hazelmere for retirees and investment; Midland for value and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
HazelmereMidland
Crime rate
Hazelmere
7872.7 / 1k
Midland
1482.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Hazelmere
7
Midland
182
Population
Hazelmere
935
Midland
6,335
Metric leadHazelmere 2Midland 6across 8 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Hazelmere | Midland |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.6/100 | 55.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 18.0/100 | 6.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 7872.7 / 1k | 1482.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 8 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 17 | 69 |
| Walkability | 27.5/100 | 75.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 7 | 182 |
| Planning activity | 1 | — |
| Population | 935 | 6,335 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
Hazelmere reads as a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city; Midland is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Hazelmere tends to lead on housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Midland stands out for a quieter safety profile and public transport access. Hazelmere generally means more sought-after housing, while Midland leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Hazelmere suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Midland is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.