Overall score
Hazelmere
38.7/100
Midland
52.8/100
Hazelmere vs Midland, WA Suburb Comparison
Midland for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
HazelmereMidland
Crime rate
Hazelmere
43.1 / 1k
Midland
43.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Hazelmere
16
Midland
321
Population
Hazelmere
935
Midland
6,335
Metric leadHazelmere 3Midland 52 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Hazelmere | Midland |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.7/100 | 52.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 55.3/100 | 49.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 43.1 / 1k | 43.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 8 |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 17 | 69 |
| Walkability | 27.5/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 16 | 321 |
| Planning activity | 1 | — |
| Green cover | 4.1% | 1.8% |
| Population | 935 | 6,335 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
Hazelmere reads as a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm; Midland is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Hazelmere tends to lead on housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Midland stands out for public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.
Hazelmere suits retirees and investors more clearly, whereas Midland is the stronger match for value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.