Bushmead vs Midland, WA suburb comparison

Bushmead for retirees and investment; Midland for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BushmeadMidland

Overall score

Bushmead

31.2/100

Midland

55.1/100

Crime rate

Bushmead

10947.9 / 1k

Midland

1482.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bushmead

2

Midland

182

Population

Bushmead

677

Midland

6,335

Metric leadBushmead 2Midland 7across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBushmeadMidland
Overall score31.2/10055.1/100
Housing (desirability)27.1/1006.3/100
Crime rate10947.9 / 1k1482.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools18
Parks & reserves6
Public transport stops969
Walkability13.5/10075.0/100
Nearby amenities2182
Population6776,335
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Bushmead is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm, and Midland is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Bushmead tends to lead on housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Midland stands out for a quieter safety profile and public transport access. On housing, Bushmead sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Midland.

Choose Bushmead if you are weighing investors; lean toward Midland for families and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons