Koongamia vs Midland, WA suburb comparison

Koongamia for investment; Midland for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KoongamiaMidland

Overall score

Koongamia

32.6/100

Midland

55.1/100

Crime rate

Koongamia

8650.2 / 1k

Midland

1482.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Koongamia

21

Midland

182

Population

Koongamia

985

Midland

6,335

Metric leadKoongamia 1Midland 81 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKoongamiaMidland
Overall score32.6/10055.1/100
Housing (desirability)13.0/1006.3/100
Crime rate8650.2 / 1k1482.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools38
Parks & reserves16
Public transport stops1069
Walkability17.0/10075.0/100
Nearby amenities21182
Population9856,335
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Koongamia is a practical metro smaller community with approachable housing and suburban calm, and Midland is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Koongamia tends to lead on housing affordability, while Midland stands out for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options.

Investors may find Koongamia the better fit, while families and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Midland.

Related comparisons