Koongamia vs Midland, WA Suburb Comparison

Koongamia for families; Midland for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KoongamiaMidland

Overall score

Koongamia

37.2/100

Midland

52.8/100

Crime rate

Koongamia

43.1 / 1k

Midland

43.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Koongamia

26

Midland

321

Population

Koongamia

985

Midland

6,335

Metric leadKoongamia 2Midland 73 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKoongamiaMidland
Overall score37.2/10052.8/100
Housing (desirability)52.8/10049.4/100
Crime rate43.1 / 1k43.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools38
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves16
Public transport stops1069
Walkability17.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities26321
Green cover2.7%1.8%
Population9856,335
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Koongamia is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand, and Midland is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Koongamia tends to lead on housing affordability, while Midland stands out for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

Investors may find Koongamia the better fit, while families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Midland.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons