Bushmead vs Koongamia, WA Suburb Comparison

Bushmead for value and schools; Koongamia for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BushmeadKoongamia

Overall score

Bushmead

38.3/100

Koongamia

37.2/100

Crime rate

Bushmead

43.1 / 1k

Koongamia

43.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bushmead

8

Koongamia

26

Population

Bushmead

677

Koongamia

985

Metric leadBushmead 2Koongamia 72 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBushmeadKoongamia
Overall score38.3/10037.2/100
Housing (desirability)50.2/10052.8/100
Crime rate43.1 / 1k43.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools13
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves—1
Public transport stops910
Walkability13.5/10017.0/100
Nearby amenities826
Green cover1.0%2.7%
Population677985
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/101/10

Comparison summary

Bushmead is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand, while Koongamia is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand.

On the data, Bushmead is stronger for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Koongamia answers with schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability.

Bushmead suits retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Koongamia is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons