Bushmead vs Koongamia, WA suburb comparison

Bushmead for retirees and investment; Koongamia for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BushmeadKoongamia

Overall score

Bushmead

31.2/100

Koongamia

32.6/100

Crime rate

Bushmead

10947.9 / 1k

Koongamia

8650.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bushmead

2

Koongamia

21

Population

Bushmead

677

Koongamia

985

Metric leadBushmead 2Koongamia 7across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBushmeadKoongamia
Overall score31.2/10032.6/100
Housing (desirability)27.1/10013.0/100
Crime rate10947.9 / 1k8650.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools13
Parks & reserves1
Public transport stops910
Walkability13.5/10017.0/100
Nearby amenities221
Population677985
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/101/10

Comparison summary

Bushmead is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm, while Koongamia is a practical metro smaller community with approachable housing and suburban calm.

On the data, Bushmead is stronger for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Koongamia answers with a quieter safety profile and public transport access. On housing, Bushmead sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Koongamia.

Bushmead suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Koongamia is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons