Bushmead vs Hazelmere, WA Suburb Comparison

Bushmead for families and value; Hazelmere for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BushmeadHazelmere

Overall score

Bushmead

38.3/100

Hazelmere

38.7/100

Crime rate

Bushmead

43.1 / 1k

Hazelmere

43.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bushmead

8

Hazelmere

16

Population

Bushmead

677

Hazelmere

935

Metric leadBushmead 1Hazelmere 72 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBushmeadHazelmere
Overall score38.3/10038.7/100
Housing (desirability)50.2/10055.3/100
Crime rate43.1 / 1k43.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Public transport stops917
Walkability13.5/10027.5/100
Nearby amenities816
Planning activity—1
Green cover1.0%4.1%
Population677935
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/106/10

Comparison summary

Bushmead reads as a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand; Hazelmere is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.

Bushmead tends to lead on housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Hazelmere stands out for public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Choose Bushmead if you are weighing retirees and households prioritising schools; lean toward Hazelmere for families and investors.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons