Overall score
Belmont
59.3/100
Midland
55.1/100
Belmont vs Midland, WA suburb comparison
Belmont for retirees and investment; Midland for families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BelmontMidland
Crime rate
Belmont
1803.2 / 1k
Midland
1482.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Belmont
133
Midland
182
Population
Belmont
6,959
Midland
6,335
Metric leadBelmont 6Midland 4across 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
Comparison summary
Belmont reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Midland is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Belmont sits closer to the city centre, whereas Midland is in a middle-ring position.
Belmont tends to lead on housing affordability and walkability, while Midland stands out for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options. On housing, Belmont sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Midland.
On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Belmont, while Midland remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.