Middle Swan vs Midland, WA Suburb Comparison

Middle Swan for families and value; Midland for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Middle SwanMidland

Overall score

Middle Swan

40.1/100

Midland

52.8/100

Crime rate

Middle Swan

43.1 / 1k

Midland

43.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Middle Swan

101

Midland

321

Population

Middle Swan

2,852

Midland

6,335

Metric leadMiddle Swan 2Midland 72 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMiddle SwanMidland
Overall score40.1/10052.8/100
Housing (desirability)50.4/10049.4/100
Crime rate43.1 / 1k43.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools38
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves—6
Public transport stops4869
Walkability34.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities101321
Green cover0.3%1.8%
Population2,8526,335
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Middle Swan is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Midland is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Middle Swan is stronger for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Midland answers with schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Middle Swan the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Midland.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons