Overall score
Middle Swan
41.7/100
Midland
55.0/100
Middle Swan vs Midland, WA suburb comparison
Middle Swan for investment and value; Midland for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Middle SwanMidland
Crime rate
Middle Swan
3220.0 / 1k
Midland
1482.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Middle Swan
59
Midland
182
Population
Middle Swan
2,852
Midland
6,335
Metric leadMiddle Swan 2Midland 7across 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for familiesMidland
- Best for investmentMiddle Swan
- Best for best valueMiddle Swan
- Best for best schoolsMidland
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Middle Swan | Midland |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 41.7/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 31.4/100 | 6.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 3220.0 / 1k | 1482.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 8 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 48 | 69 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 75.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 59 | 182 |
| Population | 2,852 | 6,335 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Middle Swan is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Midland is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Middle Swan is stronger for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Midland answers with a quieter safety profile and public transport access.
Investors and value-focused buyers may find Middle Swan the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Midland.