Midland vs Stratton, WA Suburb Comparison

Midland for retirees and families; Stratton for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MidlandStratton

Overall score

Midland

52.8/100

Stratton

39.5/100

Crime rate

Midland

43.1 / 1k

Stratton

43.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Midland

321

Stratton

61

Population

Midland

6,335

Stratton

3,267

Metric leadMidland 7Stratton 23 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMidlandStratton
Overall score52.8/10039.5/100
Housing (desirability)49.4/10067.3/100
Crime rate43.1 / 1k43.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools82
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves65
Public transport stops6931
Walkability100.0/10057.0/100
Nearby amenities32161
Green cover1.8%33.7%
Population6,3353,267
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Midland is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Stratton is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Midland is stronger for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access; Stratton answers with housing affordability.

Retirees, families, and households prioritising schools may find Midland the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Stratton.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons