Highvale vs Wights Mountain, QLD Suburb Comparison

Highvale for families and schools; Wights Mountain for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

HighvaleWights Mountain

Overall score

Highvale

62.3/100

Wights Mountain

58.1/100

Crime rate

Highvale

13.3 / 1k

Wights Mountain

13.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Highvale

41

Wights Mountain

4

Population

Highvale

1,979

Wights Mountain

767

Metric leadHighvale 5Wights Mountain 32 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHighvaleWights Mountain
Overall score62.3/10058.1/100
Housing (desirability)50.5/10060.9/100
Crime rate13.3 / 1k13.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves24
Public transport stops5—
Walkability7.5/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities414
Green cover6.0%2.3%
Population1,979767
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Highvale is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, while Wights Mountain is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace.

Highvale pulls ahead on walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community, whereas Wights Mountain is the better pick for parks and reserves, plus overall desirability.

Families may find Highvale the better fit, while value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Wights Mountain.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons