Overall score
Highvale
62.3/100
Wights Mountain
58.1/100
Highvale for families and schools; Wights Mountain for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Highvale
62.3/100
Wights Mountain
58.1/100
Crime rate
Highvale
13.3 / 1k
Wights Mountain
13.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Highvale
41
Wights Mountain
4
Population
Highvale
1,979
Wights Mountain
767
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Highvale | Wights Mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 62.3/100 | 58.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 50.5/100 | 60.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 13.3 / 1k | 13.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 31.2/100 | 31.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 5 | — |
| Walkability | 7.5/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 41 | 4 |
| Green cover | 6.0% | 2.3% |
| Population | 1,979 | 767 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Highvale is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, while Wights Mountain is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace.
Highvale pulls ahead on walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community, whereas Wights Mountain is the better pick for parks and reserves, plus overall desirability.
Families may find Highvale the better fit, while value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Wights Mountain.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.