Overall score
Mount Nebo
52.4/100
Wights Mountain
58.1/100
Wights Mountain for families and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mount Nebo
52.4/100
Wights Mountain
58.1/100
Crime rate
Mount Nebo
11.8 / 1k
Wights Mountain
13.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount Nebo
16
Wights Mountain
4
Population
Mount Nebo
430
Wights Mountain
767
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Nebo | Wights Mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.4/100 | 58.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 58.5/100 | 60.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 11.8 / 1k | 13.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 31.2/100 | 31.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 4 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 16 | 4 |
| Green cover | 3.3% | 2.3% |
| Population | 430 | 767 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 10/10 |
Mount Nebo is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Wights Mountain is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace.
Mount Nebo pulls ahead on nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Wights Mountain is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability. On housing, Mount Nebo sits in a gently premium band, compared with a expensive feel in Wights Mountain.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Wights Mountain, while Mount Nebo remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.