Overall score
Mount Nebo
43.5/100
Wights Mountain
63.3/100
Wights Mountain for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mount Nebo
43.5/100
Wights Mountain
63.3/100
Crime rate
Mount Nebo
8.8 / 1k
Wights Mountain
7.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount Nebo
9
Wights Mountain
4
Population
Mount Nebo
430
Wights Mountain
767
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Nebo | Wights Mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.5/100 | 63.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 45.6/100 | 91.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 8.8 / 1k | 7.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 4 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 9 | 4 |
| Population | 430 | 767 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 10/10 |
Mount Nebo is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Wights Mountain is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace.
Mount Nebo pulls ahead on nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Wights Mountain is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. On housing, Mount Nebo sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Wights Mountain.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Wights Mountain, while Mount Nebo remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.