Samford Valley vs Wights Mountain, QLD suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Samford Valley | Wights Mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 56.8/100 | 62.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 91.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 6.9 / 1k | 6.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 8 | — |
| Walkability | 14.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 75 | 4 |
| Population | 3,208 | 767 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesWights Mountain
- Best for investmentWights Mountain
- Best for best valueWights Mountain
- Best for best schoolsWights Mountain
Comparison summary
Samford Valley and Wights Mountain offer different strengths across official suburb data. Samford Valley leads on more comparison categories overall. Overall score favours Wights Mountain; Housing (desirability) favours Wights Mountain; Crime rate favours Wights Mountain. Quick verdicts: Retirees → Wights Mountain, Investment → Wights Mountain, Best value → Wights Mountain, Best schools → Wights Mountain.