Overall score
Samford Valley
58.5/100
Wights Mountain
58.1/100
Samford Valley for retirees and families; Wights Mountain for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Samford Valley
58.5/100
Wights Mountain
58.1/100
Crime rate
Samford Valley
13.3 / 1k
Wights Mountain
13.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Samford Valley
89
Wights Mountain
4
Population
Samford Valley
3,208
Wights Mountain
767
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Samford Valley | Wights Mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 58.5/100 | 58.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 43.1/100 | 60.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 13.3 / 1k | 13.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 31.2/100 | 31.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 8 | — |
| Walkability | 14.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 89 | 4 |
| Green cover | 8.8% | 2.3% |
| Population | 3,208 | 767 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Samford Valley reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Wights Mountain is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Wights Mountain sits among greener hillside streets, while Samford Valley keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Samford Valley is stronger for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and walkability; Wights Mountain answers with housing affordability and overall desirability.
On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Wights Mountain, while Samford Valley remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.