Samford Valley vs Wights Mountain, QLD suburb comparison

Wights Mountain for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Samford ValleyWights Mountain

Overall score

Samford Valley

57.5/100

Wights Mountain

63.2/100

Crime rate

Samford Valley

7.9 / 1k

Wights Mountain

7.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Samford Valley

75

Wights Mountain

4

Population

Samford Valley

3,208

Wights Mountain

767

Metric leadSamford Valley 4Wights Mountain 32 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategorySamford ValleyWights Mountain
Overall score57.5/10063.2/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10091.7/100
Crime rate7.9 / 1k7.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Parks & reserves124
Public transport stops8
Walkability14.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities754
Population3,208767
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Samford Valley reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Wights Mountain is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Wights Mountain sits among greener hillside streets, while Samford Valley keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Samford Valley is stronger for parks and reserves and walkability; Wights Mountain answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Wights Mountain, while Samford Valley remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons