Overall score
Samford Valley
57.5/100
Wights Mountain
63.2/100
Wights Mountain for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Samford Valley
57.5/100
Wights Mountain
63.2/100
Crime rate
Samford Valley
7.9 / 1k
Wights Mountain
7.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Samford Valley
75
Wights Mountain
4
Population
Samford Valley
3,208
Wights Mountain
767
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Samford Valley | Wights Mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 57.5/100 | 63.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 91.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 7.9 / 1k | 7.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 8 | — |
| Walkability | 14.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 75 | 4 |
| Population | 3,208 | 767 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Samford Valley reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Wights Mountain is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Wights Mountain sits among greener hillside streets, while Samford Valley keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Samford Valley is stronger for parks and reserves and walkability; Wights Mountain answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Wights Mountain, while Samford Valley remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.