Samford Valley vs Wights Mountain, QLD Suburb Comparison

Samford Valley for retirees and families; Wights Mountain for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Samford ValleyWights Mountain

Overall score

Samford Valley

58.5/100

Wights Mountain

58.1/100

Crime rate

Samford Valley

13.3 / 1k

Wights Mountain

13.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Samford Valley

89

Wights Mountain

4

Population

Samford Valley

3,208

Wights Mountain

767

Metric leadSamford Valley 6Wights Mountain 23 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategorySamford ValleyWights Mountain
Overall score58.5/10058.1/100
Housing (desirability)43.1/10060.9/100
Crime rate13.3 / 1k13.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves124
Public transport stops8—
Walkability14.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities894
Green cover8.8%2.3%
Population3,208767
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Samford Valley reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Wights Mountain is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Wights Mountain sits among greener hillside streets, while Samford Valley keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Samford Valley is stronger for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and walkability; Wights Mountain answers with housing affordability and overall desirability.

On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Wights Mountain, while Samford Valley remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons