Overall score
Camp Mountain
60.8/100
Wights Mountain
58.1/100
Camp Mountain vs Wights Mountain, QLD Suburb Comparison
Camp Mountain for schools; Wights Mountain for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Camp MountainWights Mountain
Crime rate
Camp Mountain
13.1 / 1k
Wights Mountain
13.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Camp Mountain
15
Wights Mountain
4
Population
Camp Mountain
1,447
Wights Mountain
767
Metric leadCamp Mountain 4Wights Mountain 33 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for familiesWights Mountain
- Best for investmentWights Mountain
- Best for best schoolsCamp Mountain
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Camp Mountain | Wights Mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 60.8/100 | 58.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.8/100 | 60.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 13.1 / 1k | 13.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 31.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 4 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 15 | 4 |
| Green cover | 2.2% | 2.3% |
| Population | 1,447 | 767 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Camp Mountain is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace, while Wights Mountain is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace.
On the data, Camp Mountain is stronger for a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community; Wights Mountain answers with parks and reserves, plus overall desirability.
Families may find Camp Mountain the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Wights Mountain.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.