Kambah vs Robina Suburb Comparison (ACT vs QLD)

Kambah for investment; Robina for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KambahRobina

Overall score

Kambah

57.2/100

Robina

58.8/100

Crime rate

Kambah

16.5 / 1k

Robina

42.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kambah

290

Robina

518

Population

Kambah

15,670

Robina

25,659

Metric leadKambah 4Robina 7across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKambahRobina
Overall score57.2/10058.8/100
Housing (desirability)66.0/10063.6/100
Crime rate16.5 / 1k42.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools34
Weather (desirability)51.2/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves5112
Public transport stops—92
Walkability92.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities290518
Planning activity22—
Green cover6.5%10.1%
Population15,67025,659
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/108/10

Comparison summary

Across states, Kambah is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, whereas Robina is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Kambah tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Robina stands out for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and walkability.

On balance, families are more likely to prefer Robina, while Kambah remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons