Kambah vs Robina suburb comparison (ACT vs QLD)

Robina for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KambahRobina

Overall score

Kambah

76.5/100

Robina

78.2/100

Crime rate

Kambah

16.5 / 1k

Robina

25.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kambah

260

Robina

490

Population

Kambah

15,670

Robina

25,659

Metric leadKambah 2Robina 61 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKambahRobina
Overall score76.5/10078.2/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate16.5 / 1k25.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools34
Parks & reserves5112
Public transport stops92
Walkability92.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities260490
Planning activity16
Population15,67025,659
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/108/10

Comparison summary

Across states, Kambah is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, whereas Robina is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Kambah tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and overall desirability, while Robina stands out for schools and education options and parks and reserves.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Kambah, while Robina remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons