Overall score
Kawungan
34.6/100
Scarness
43.1/100
Kawungan for value; Scarness for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Kawungan
34.6/100
Scarness
43.1/100
Crime rate
Kawungan
70.1 / 1k
Scarness
70.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kawungan
18
Scarness
47
Population
Kawungan
5,460
Scarness
3,646
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kawungan | Scarness |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 34.6/100 | 43.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 70.2/100 | 62.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 70.1 / 1k | 70.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 31.2/100 | 31.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 4 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 48.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 18 | 47 |
| Green cover | 0.6% | 4.2% |
| Population | 5,460 | 3,646 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 1/10 |
Kawungan is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, while Scarness is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.
Kawungan pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a larger local community, whereas Scarness is the better pick for parks and reserves, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Kawungan sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Scarness.
On balance, retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Kawungan, while Scarness remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.