Scarness vs Urraween, QLD Suburb Comparison

Scarness for families and investment; Urraween for retirees and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ScarnessUrraween

Overall score

Scarness

43.1/100

Urraween

43.3/100

Crime rate

Scarness

70.1 / 1k

Urraween

70.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Scarness

47

Urraween

79

Population

Scarness

3,646

Urraween

7,951

Metric leadScarness 2Urraween 63 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryScarnessUrraween
Overall score43.1/10043.3/100
Housing (desirability)62.2/10063.8/100
Crime rate70.1 / 1k70.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools33
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves41
Walkability48.5/10026.5/100
Nearby amenities4779
Green cover4.2%7.8%
Population3,6467,951
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/102/10

Comparison summary

Scarness reads as a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience; Urraween is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.

Scarness tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and walkability, while Urraween stands out for housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability. Scarness generally means more approachable housing costs, while Urraween leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Urraween, while Scarness remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons