Kingston vs Red Hill, ACT suburb comparison

Kingston for families and schools; Red Hill for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KingstonRed Hill

Overall score

Kingston

63.7/100

Red Hill

54.8/100

Crime rate

Kingston

18.0 / 1k

Red Hill

12.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kingston

664

Red Hill

121

Population

Kingston

6,579

Red Hill

3,146

Metric leadKingston 6Red Hill 21 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKingstonRed Hill
Overall score63.7/10054.8/100
Housing (desirability)12.0/10016.3/100
Crime rate18.0 / 1k12.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools54
Parks & reserves3
Walkability100.0/10055.5/100
Nearby amenities664121
Planning activity17
Population6,5793,146
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Kingston is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Red Hill is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Kingston pulls ahead on schools and education options and walkability, whereas Red Hill is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Kingston suits families and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Red Hill is the stronger match for retirees and investors.

Related comparisons