Labrador vs Runaway Bay, QLD suburb comparison

Labrador for investment and value; Runaway Bay for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LabradorRunaway Bay

Overall score

Labrador

56.1/100

Runaway Bay

50.8/100

Crime rate

Labrador

86.0 / 1k

Runaway Bay

34.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Labrador

369

Runaway Bay

236

Population

Labrador

18,643

Runaway Bay

9,308

Metric leadLabrador 8Runaway Bay 2across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLabradorRunaway Bay
Overall score56.1/10050.8/100
Housing (desirability)24.9/10014.8/100
Crime rate86.0 / 1k34.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools52
Parks & reserves247
Public transport stops7234
Walkability100.0/10082.0/100
Nearby amenities369236
Population18,6439,308
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/107/10

Comparison summary

Labrador reads as an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Runaway Bay is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Labrador tends to lead on housing affordability and parks and reserves, while Runaway Bay stands out for a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Labrador generally means more approachable housing costs, while Runaway Bay leans toward more sought-after housing.

Labrador suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Runaway Bay is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Related comparisons