Overall score
Labrador
56.1/100
Runaway Bay
50.8/100
Labrador for investment and value; Runaway Bay for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Labrador
56.1/100
Runaway Bay
50.8/100
Crime rate
Labrador
86.0 / 1k
Runaway Bay
34.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Labrador
369
Runaway Bay
236
Population
Labrador
18,643
Runaway Bay
9,308
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Labrador | Runaway Bay |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 56.1/100 | 50.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 24.9/100 | 14.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 86.0 / 1k | 34.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 24 | 7 |
| Public transport stops | 72 | 34 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 82.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 369 | 236 |
| Population | 18,643 | 9,308 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 7/10 |
Labrador reads as an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Runaway Bay is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Labrador tends to lead on housing affordability and parks and reserves, while Runaway Bay stands out for a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Labrador generally means more approachable housing costs, while Runaway Bay leans toward more sought-after housing.
Labrador suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Runaway Bay is the stronger match for retirees and families.