Overall score
Lyrup
36.6/100
Paringa
46.5/100
Paringa for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Lyrup
36.6/100
Paringa
46.5/100
Crime rate
Lyrup
10.1 / 1k
Paringa
11.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Lyrup
2
Paringa
94
Population
Lyrup
346
Paringa
1,131
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Lyrup | Paringa |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 36.6/100 | 46.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 49.7/100 | 48.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 10.1 / 1k | 11.5 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 5.7/100 | 5.7/100 |
| Public transport stops | — | 1 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 30.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 94 |
| Planning activity | 3 | 12 |
| Green cover | 0.5% | 0.6% |
| Population | 346 | 1,131 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Lyrup is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, and Paringa is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace.
Lyrup tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, while Paringa stands out for housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.
Retirees and families may find Lyrup the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Paringa.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.