Lyrup vs Paringa, SA Suburb Comparison

Paringa for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LyrupParinga

Overall score

Lyrup

36.6/100

Paringa

46.5/100

Crime rate

Lyrup

10.1 / 1k

Paringa

11.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Lyrup

2

Paringa

94

Population

Lyrup

346

Paringa

1,131

Metric leadLyrup 3Paringa 52 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLyrupParinga
Overall score36.6/10046.5/100
Housing (desirability)49.7/10048.9/100
Crime rate10.1 / 1k11.5 / 1k
Weather (desirability)5.7/1005.7/100
Public transport stops—1
Walkability0.0/10030.5/100
Nearby amenities294
Planning activity312
Green cover0.5%0.6%
Population3461,131
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Lyrup is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, and Paringa is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace.

Lyrup tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, while Paringa stands out for housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Retirees and families may find Lyrup the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Paringa.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons