Overall score
Paringa
46.5/100
Renmark
42.6/100
Paringa vs Renmark, SA Suburb Comparison
Paringa for retirees and families; Renmark for investment and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ParingaRenmark
Crime rate
Paringa
11.5 / 1k
Renmark
71.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Paringa
94
Renmark
309
Population
Paringa
1,131
Renmark
4,705
Metric leadParinga 4Renmark 61 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Paringa | Renmark |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 46.5/100 | 42.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.9/100 | 69.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 11.5 / 1k | 71.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 6 |
| Weather (desirability) | 5.7/100 | 5.7/100 |
| Public transport stops | 1 | 11 |
| Walkability | 30.5/100 | 86.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 94 | 309 |
| Planning activity | 12 | 63 |
| Green cover | 0.6% | 1.8% |
| Population | 1,131 | 4,705 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
Paringa reads as a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace; Renmark is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.
Paringa pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Renmark is the better pick for housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability.
Retirees may find Paringa the better fit, while investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Renmark.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.