Macgregor vs Nathan, QLD suburb comparison

Nathan for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MacgregorNathan

Overall score

Macgregor

52.8/100

Nathan

58.7/100

Crime rate

Macgregor

49.6 / 1k

Nathan

52.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Macgregor

162

Nathan

119

Population

Macgregor

5,980

Nathan

1,085

Metric leadMacgregor 7Nathan 3across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMacgregorNathan
Overall score52.8/10058.7/100
Housing (desirability)30.2/10076.0/100
Crime rate49.6 / 1k52.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools85
Parks & reserves41
Public transport stops3411
Walkability51.0/10047.5/100
Nearby amenities162119
Population5,9801,085
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/109/10

Comparison summary

Macgregor reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Nathan is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by. Macgregor sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Nathan is closer to the city centre.

Macgregor tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves, while Nathan stands out for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Macgregor generally means more mid-market housing value, while Nathan leans toward more sought-after housing.

Choose Macgregor if you are weighing families and households prioritising schools; lean toward Nathan for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons